Last week (04/15/2015) the United Nations
Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) is again listening to technical and
legal experts on the subject of killer robots, weapons systems designed to
shoot without human intervention. The series of panel discussions and lectures
is the last step on the way to an international treaty on autonomous lethal
weapons. The expectation is that the killer robots become so hateful as
landmines and chemical weapons. The key element in the discussions is the
definition of "significant human control" - what kind of human
intervention is necessary in the process of killing someone on the battlefield
or out?
International Humanitarian Law
Peter
Asaro, a researcher at Stanford University and member of the International
Committee for the Control of Robotic Arms, said during the panel that there is
a growing consensus that it is unacceptable that robots kill people without
human supervision. "I think there is a consensus on the fact that, in its
most extreme form, you simply can not have guns out there without any human
supervision," said Asaro. "But there is still disagreement and work
to be done on how we can define it in legal terms.
Ban of killer robots
Even the estimates more hopes of the
delegates at the meeting suggest that a treaty or formal prohibition of killer
robots will take at least a year or two. But the fact that the ONU agrees to
continue discussing the issue is being seen as a sign that this resolution is
on the horizon.
By Rosana Ribeiro
By Rosana Ribeiro
No comments:
Post a Comment